Complaint in electronic form

NB: A complaint must be lodged in Polish.

Complaints lodged in electronic form, in addition to the requirements of a complaint submitted in the traditional form, must:

  1. a. be accompanied by a qualified electronic signature or signature confirmed by the ePUAP trusted profile, or authenticated in a way that ensures the possibility of confirming the origin and integrity of the verified data in electronic form,
  2. include the electronic address of the applicant1.

If the complaint is submitted electronically by a proxy, the power of attorney in the form of an electronic document should be accompanied by a qualified electronic signature or a signature confirmed by the ePUAP trusted profile by the principal. If copies of powers of attorney or copies of other documents showing the authorization have been made in the form of an electronic document, then their authentication shall be carried out with a qualified electronic signature or signature confirmed by the ePUAP trusted profile2. Copies of powers of attorney or copies of other documents showing electronically authenticated authorization must be prepared in the data formats specified in the regulations issued on the basis of Art. 18 point 1 of the Act of February 17, 2005 on computerization of the activities of entities performing public tasks.

NB!

The complaint is sent by electronic means through the Electronic Inbox of the President of the Office3 - FORM 

Complaints / applications that do not contain the name and address of the applicant will not be further considered.

 

ATTENTION:

Object, before you lodge a complaint.

If the data controller does not know that you do not wish your data to be processed, the President of the Personal Data Protection Office might not be able to fulfil your request.

According to Art. 21 para. 2 and 3 of the GDPR, where personal data are processed for direct marketing purposes, the data subject shall have the right to object at any time to processing of personal data concerning him or her for such marketing, which includes profiling to the extent that it is related to such direct marketing.

Where the data subject objects to processing for direct marketing purposes, the personal data shall no longer be processed for such purposes.

As foreseen in Art. 58 para. 2 letter c, the corrective power of the supervisory authority to order the controller or the processor to comply with the data subject's requests to exercise his or her rights, requires the data subject to approach the controller/processor with his/her request first.

IMPORTANT: The data subject has the right to request the controller to erase his/her personal data without delay.

According to Art. 17 para. 1 letter c of the GDPR, the controller shall have the obligation to erase personal data without undue delay where the data subject objects to the processing pursuant to Art. 21 para. 1 or Art. 21 para. 2 of the GDPR.

In reference to the objection as laid down in Art. 21 para. 1, the controller can be relieved from this obligation if it demonstrates compelling legitimate grounds for the processing which override the interests, rights and freedoms of the data subject or for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims.

In the event where data subject, pursuant to Art. 21 para. 2 of the GDPR, objects to processing for direct marketing purposes, the personal data shall no longer be processed for such purposes.

 


1 Article 63 § 3a of the Act of 14 June 1960 - Code of Administrative Procedure (Journal of Laws of 2017, item 1257, as amended)
2 Article 33 §2-§3a of the Act of 14 June 1960 - Code of Administrative Procedure (Journal of Laws of 2017, item 1257, as amended)
3 Article 63 § 1 of the Act of 14 June 1960 - Code of Administrative Procedure (Journal of Laws of 2017, item 1257, as amended)
2018-07-31 Metadane artykułu
;